Greenwashing in UK Asset Management: Deceptive Sustainability Claims

In an era where environmental consciousness is increasingly shaping consumer behaviour and investment decisions, asset management firms in the UK are under significant pressure to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability. 

However, with this growing demand for environmentally responsible investing comes a darker side: greenwashing. This term, used to describe the practice of overstating or fabricating the environmental benefits of a product or service, poses a significant challenge in the realm of asset management. This article explores the nuances of greenwashing within UK asset management firms, its implications, and the measures being taken to combat this deceptive practice.

Understanding Greenwashing in Asset Management

Greenwashing in asset management involves promoting investment products as more environmentally friendly than they truly are. This can occur in several ways, such as misrepresenting the environmental impact of funds, selectively disclosing favourable information while ignoring negative aspects, or using misleading labels and marketing strategies to attract eco-conscious investors. The primary goal is to capitalise on the growing demand for sustainable investments without making meaningful changes to investment strategies or operations.

The Rise of Sustainable Investments

The surge in popularity of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has transformed the asset management industry. Investors increasingly seek to align their portfolios with their values, prioritising companies and funds that demonstrate strong environmental stewardship. In response, asset management firms have launched "green" or "sustainable" funds, aiming to capture this increasing market segment. However, the lack of clear and standardised criteria for what constitutes a sustainable investment creates ample opportunity for greenwashing.

Techniques of Greenwashing

1. Misleading Labels and Certifications: Some asset managers use vague or misleading labels such as "eco-friendly" or "low-carbon" without providing evidence or clear criteria for these claims. This can mislead investors into believing a fund is more sustainable than it is.
2. Selective Disclosure: Firms may highlight the green aspects of their portfolios while downplaying or omitting investments in industries with significant environmental impacts, such as fossil fuels or deforestation.
3. Inflated Impact Claims: Exaggerating the environmental benefits of investments, such as overstating reductions in carbon emissions, is another common tactic. This can involve creative accounting practices that misrepresent the true environmental impact.
4. Tokenism: Allocating a small portion of a fund to genuinely sustainable investments while the majority of the portfolio remains unchanged can create a false impression of overall sustainability.

Implications of Greenwashing

The consequences of greenwashing are significant, affecting investors, the environment, and the integrity of the financial system. For investors, greenwashing undermines trust and can lead to financial losses if investments do not deliver on their promised environmental benefits. It also diverts capital away from genuinely sustainable projects, slowing progress towards environmental goals. For the asset management industry itself, greenwashing damages reputations and may lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and penalties.¹

Regulatory and Industry Responses

In the UK, regulators and industry bodies have taken steps to address greenwashing and promote transparency in sustainable investing:

• Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): The FCA has issued guidelines² for asset managers on how to disclose their sustainability practices transparently regarding the anti-greenwashing rule. These guidelines aim to prevent misleading claims and ensure that investors have access to accurate information. There is also guidance³ regarding investment labels that can be used in naming funds and investments. 
• UK Green Taxonomy: The development of a UK Green Taxonomy⁴ aims to create a framework for defining and classifying sustainable investments. This initiative seeks to provide clarity and consistency, helping investors make informed decisions.
• Industry Initiatives: Several industry-led initiatives, such as the Investment Association's Responsible Investment Framework,⁵ have emerged to set standards and best practices for sustainable investing. These initiatives encourage asset managers to adopt robust ESG criteria and report transparently on their sustainability efforts.

Future Directions and Challenges

As awareness of greenwashing grows, the asset management industry is likely to face increased scrutiny from regulators, investors, and the public. To maintain credibility and attract sustainable investment, firms must prioritise transparency and accountability in their ESG practices. This includes adopting standardised sustainability metrics, increased pressure to conduct independent audits,⁶ and providing comprehensive disclosures of both positive and negative environmental impacts.

However, challenges remain. The evolving nature of sustainability criteria, the complexity of global supply chains, and the need for international cooperation all complicate efforts to combat greenwashing. Asset managers must navigate these challenges while balancing the demands of investors, regulators, and stakeholders.

Research⁷ shows that in the last half of 2024, 72 funds had “ESG” or “Sustainable” removed from their fund titles, where 153 funds in Europe underwent some name change in terms of sustainability. 

Some asset management firms have decided it is time to refocus efforts. Morgan Stanley Investment Management indicated that a sustainability-focused spin-off of a long-running asset fund would be going into liquidation,⁸ along with BlackRock and JPM Asset Management similarly shutting down funds.⁹

Conclusion

As awareness of greenwashing grows, the asset management industry is likely to face increased scrutiny from regulators, investors and the public. To maintain credibility and attract investment, firms must prioritise transparency and accountability in their ESG practices. Firms should ensure that claims are backed up with verifiable data and certifications from reputable third-party organisations. The evolving nature of sustainability criteria, focus on regulators and complexity of global supply chains complicate efforts to combat greenwashing, and it is imperative that firms keep abreast of industry standards. Asset managers must navigate these challenges while balancing the demands of investors, regulators and stakeholders. 

Sources

^{[1] SEC.gov | Press Releases
[2] FG24/3: Finalised non-handbook guidance on the anti-greenwashing rule | FCA
[3] Sustainability disclosure and labelling regime | FCA
[4] UK Green Taxonomy - GOV.UK
[5] The Investment Association | Investment Manager Trade Body
[6] ALFI - ALFI Private Assets Conference 2023 report
[7] Citywire Selector | ‘Don’t push it as ESG’: What’s going on with sustainable funds?
[8] Citywire Selector | Morgan Stanley IM latest to liquidate sustainable fund spinoff
[9] Citywire Selector | ‘Don’t push it as ESG’: What’s going on with sustainable funds?}

Sign up to receive all the latest insights from Ankura. Subscribe now 

^{© Copyright 2025. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of Ankura Consulting Group, LLC., its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals. Ankura is not a law firm and cannot provide legal advice.}