Introduction
Although external and forensic auditors often hold similar qualifications — typically as certified public accountants — and share a common understanding of foundational concepts like sampling, materiality, and control effectiveness, their roles diverge significantly in purpose and approach. Recognizing these differences is critical for navigating financial, legal, and regulatory risks. Yet, the distinction is frequently misunderstood, particularly during internal investigations when management may ask, “Why didn’t the audit catch this?”
External auditors provide assurance that financial statements are free from material misstatement, serving stakeholders such as investors, regulators, and the public. In contrast, forensic auditors are specialists engaged to investigate suspected fraud, misconduct, or control failures. Their work is typically relied on by boards and executive management for internal decision-making, legal strategy, and regulatory response.
Understanding these differing mandates helps organizations deploy the right expertise at the right time, minimizing risk and preventing isolated issues from escalating into material financial or reputational damage.
Auditor or Investigator? A Simple Analogy
According to the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), external audits detect fewer than 3% of occupational fraud cases. This limitation stems from the fundamental design of external audits, which focus on providing reasonable assurance of financial statement accuracy rather than comprehensive fraud detection. When specific financial irregularities are suspected or alleged, organizations require specialized investigative expertise that goes beyond traditional audit methodologies.
One way to understand the roles of external auditors and forensic auditors is through the analogy of law enforcement functions:
- External auditors are like patrol officers: focused on routine oversight to maintain order.
- Forensic auditors are like detectives: brought in when something has gone wrong and a thorough investigation is needed.
External Auditors: Routine Oversight for Assurance
Like patrol officers, external auditors maintain oversight through structured procedures. Their work includes:
- Preventive Presence: External audits have a deterrent effect by encouraging accurate financial reporting, but detection of wrongdoing is not their primary aim.
- Standardized Methodology: Auditors follow established procedures, examining financial statements through a combination of risk-based and statistical sampling techniques to evaluate whether financial statements are fairly presented in line with applicable accounting standards.
- Materiality Focus: Efforts are concentrated on the areas most likely to contain material misstatements for the specific reporting period.
This is akin to patrolling a known high-crime area: visible, structured, but reactive only to observed violations.
Forensic Auditors: Targeted Investigative Specialists
Forensic auditors operate like detectives: engaged when red flags emerge. Their work differs fundamentally:
- Event-Driven Engagement: Typically brought in due to specific allegations, anomalies, or suspicions of misconduct. Even if used proactively, it is in response to a specific risk or concern.
- Comprehensive Examination: Rather than relying on sampling, forensic auditors assess all relevant data to uncover facts: who did what, when, how, and why.
- Legal Orientation: Forensic work is conducted with potential legal proceedings in mind. As such, forensic auditors often work under legal privilege and must ensure evidence collection and documentation meet standards for admissibility in litigation or regulatory proceedings. No such privilege exists for external auditors or their underlying audit evidence.
What Sets Forensic Auditors Apart?
Different Tools for Different Objectives
Aspect | External Audit | Forensic Audit |
Trigger | Routine, annual process | Reactive to specific allegations or identified risk |
Approach | Sampling techniques based on materiality | Comprehensive review of all relevant data |
Evidence Standards | Sufficient for audit opinion | Must meet legal admissibility standards |
Reporting | Opinion on financial statements | Factual findings used by management, regulators, or courts |
Key Roles of Forensic Auditors
1. Internal Investigations: Uncovering the Facts
Organizations engage forensic auditors when specific financial irregularities are suspected or alleged. Common scenarios include:
- Asset Misappropriation Cases: When employees are suspected of theft, unauthorized payments, or creating fictitious transactions for personal benefit.
- Financial Reporting Fraud: When management may be manipulating financial results through improper revenue recognition, expense manipulation, or other accounting irregularities.
- Corruption and Conflicts of Interest: When concerns arise about bribery, kickbacks, or undisclosed related-party transactions.
The investigative approach employed by forensic auditors enables them to trace transaction flows, analyze patterns, conduct interviews, and utilize digital forensics techniques that are beyond the scope of traditional external audits. Their training in accountancy and audit principles means they can also support the company and their legal advisors in ensuring the internal investigation is scoped and delivered to meet external auditors’ expectations.
2. Compliance Assessments: Testing the System
In high-risk operational environments, organizations may engage forensic auditors to assess legal and regulatory compliance, particularly in:
- International Operations: Where complex regulatory environments and cultural differences may create elevated risks of compliance violations.
- Third-Party Relationships: Where vendors, agents, or joint venture partners may present compliance risks that require deeper investigation than standard due diligence procedures.
- Post-Incident Reviews: Where organizations seek to understand the root causes of compliance failures and implement effective remediation measures.
3. Transactional Due Diligence: Looking Under the Hood
In merger and acquisition contexts, forensic auditors complement traditional financial and legal due diligence by providing specialized analysis of potential fraud risks and historical irregularities. Their work may include:
- Historical Transaction Analysis: Examining patterns in financial data and specific transactions for indications of financial manipulation or potential corruption risks.
- Third-Party Relationship Review: Analyzing vendor and customer relationships for potential conflicts of interest or fraudulent arrangements.
- Management Integrity Assessment: Evaluating the historical conduct of target company management through background checks and analysis of past business practices.
Support in Legal and Regulatory Actions
Evidence That Holds Up in Court
Unlike external auditors, forensic auditors tailor their work for potential legal proceedings by ensuring:
- Rigorous Documentation: All investigative procedures are thoroughly documented with clear chains of custody for physical and electronic evidence.
- Preservation Protocols: Electronic evidence is collected and preserved using forensically sound methods that maintain data integrity.
- Forensic Standards: Forensic investigations adhere to professional standards that support the admissibility of findings in litigation or regulatory proceedings.
Interfacing with Regulators
Forensic auditors often serve as intermediaries between organizations and regulatory authorities, helping to:
- Facilitate Disclosure: Ensuring that regulatory reporting requirements are met with accurate and complete information about identified misconduct.
- Support Cooperation: Providing well-documented findings that demonstrate organizational commitment to addressing compliance issues.
- Expert Testimony: Serving as expert witnesses who can explain complex financial matters to regulators, courts, and arbitrators.
Beyond Spreadsheets: The Use of Data and Digital Evidence
In addition to traditional investigative methods, forensic auditors often rely on forensic data analytics, digital evidence review and business intelligence to support their work. These tools enhance the depth, speed, and accuracy of complex investigations.
- Data Analytics Techniques: Forensic auditors use advanced analytics to identify patterns, anomalies, and outliers across large volumes of transactional data. The data sources used often extend well beyond the scope of external audits, such as activity logs, IP address data, and micropayments.
- Digital Evidence Collection: Investigations often involve the collection and analysis of electronic evidence, including emails, chat logs, financial system data, and activity logs. Forensic auditors work closely with digital forensics specialists to ensure this evidence is preserved and reviewed in a manner that is forensically sound and legally defensible.
- Intelligence Gathering: Deep open-source research into, for example, related parties, historical business practices, public tender habits, and legal and reputational concerns can provide forensic auditors with important context and potential leads within investigations.
- Integrated Investigative Approach: By combining traditional accounting procedures with data analytics, digital forensics, and business intelligence, forensic auditors can more effectively uncover fraud schemes and better assess the intent and methods behind misconduct.
Conclusion
Forensic auditors bring targeted investigative expertise to situations where routine audits are not designed to go. Whether responding to allegations of misconduct, assessing compliance risks, or conducting integrity-focused due diligence, their role is to analyze fact patterns, uncover evidence, and present findings that can withstand legal and regulatory scrutiny.
Whereas external auditors provide assurance to the market, forensic auditors provide clarity to leadership. Their work allows organizations to act decisively, manage financial and reputational risk, and demonstrate accountability in the face of scrutiny.
If you would like to discuss how these issues apply to your organization or request support, please contact Ankura’s specialized advisory team.
Sign up to receive all the latest insights from Ankura. Subscribe now
© Copyright 2025. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and not necessarily the views of Ankura Consulting Group, LLC., its management, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or its other professionals. Ankura is not a law firm and cannot provide legal advice.